Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 6327

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to Plan: no alternatives for consideration i.e. no Green Belt development as an option, no total area provided so cant work out densities, not viewable under consultations page, district council are doubled no of dwellings since 1965, rest of UK only increased by 2/3rds, proposals not in context of neighbouring authorities, use of Green Belt sets dangerous precedent, No precedent for rezoning of GB for HCC and Heritage Foundation.

Object

Representation ID: 6328

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to SP5: GB sites adjoining settlements creating sprawl,

Object

Representation ID: 6329

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to SP7: lack of consideration of infrastructure, no mention of HCC, Highways Agency, Network Rail, NHS even though Government requires this.

Object

Representation ID: 6330

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

No clear sustainable employment plan, 15000 homes means 20-25,000 new workers, however plan makes provision for 4000 jobs, outside our area would be unsustainable, previously expansion of residential meant expansion of employment.

Object

Representation ID: 6331

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to development in Baldock: Clothall Common development increase the size of this traditional market town by one third, doubling its present size would completely destroy its pleasant character.

Object

Representation ID: 6332

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Rezoning of Green Belt would virtually fill in the gap between the two settlements and damage the highly individual character of this village.

Object

Representation ID: 6333

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Rezoning of Green Belt adjacent to this village would lead to it being practically swamped and probably in the long term, absorbed into an ever-expanding Stevenage.

Object

Representation ID: 6334

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to re-zoning of Highover Farm land as nibbles away at land between Hitchin and Letchworth.

Object

Representation ID: 6335

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to re-zone of GB land around the whole of the town particularly to the north and west of the grange estate (LG1).

Garden City principles should be maintained.

Object

Representation ID: 6336

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Anthony Burrows

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to re-zoning of Green Belt to provide 2000 homes - based on nil net migration may not be needed.