Policy CGB5: Urban Open Land
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 1297
Received: 28/10/2016
Respondent: Mr Jeremy Clayton
Agent: Savills
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Object CGB5: Urban Open Land designation (Royston) sterilizes area and inhibits growth within defensible boundary of A505
See attachment
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 3901
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Letchworth Garden City Heritage Foundation
Welcome the inclusion of this policy - such land plays an important role in reinforcing the character and setting of Letchworth Garden City.
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 4394
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: New Road Developments Ltd
Agent: DLP (Planning) Limited
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Support the approach of removing land from the green belt and designating as urban open land.
Amendments needed to the policy to make the Plan effective.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 5266
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Letchworth Sustainability Forum
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Object to CGB5:
- No ecological/horticultural case for small holdings
- Food growing for local consumption
- Promote environmental awareness
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6144
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Support CGB5 with changes (see below).
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6147
Received: 23/11/2016
Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Proposals Map and para 6.26 - Proposal to move GB boundaries from current long established position solely because there is an equally or more defensible location elsewhere is contrary to National GB policy. Reasoning not exceptional circumstances
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6239
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Mrs Fiona Hill
Number of people: 7
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object CGB5:
- due to the high allocation of housing already within this area, classification and importance should be given to leisure, retail or commercial development in this region.
- shortage of land available for leisure (such as land availability to move Royston Football Club) and this should be carefully considered when allocating areas of land. NPPF 8 (Promoting Healthy Communities) particularly encourages this and Policy CGB5 endorses this
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6355
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Grow it Yourself Organic
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Object to CGB5: Refer to use of urban fringe areas for food production and composting
See attached