Policy CGB2: Exception sites in rural areas

Showing comments and forms 1 to 9 of 9

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 1111

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Phil Beavis

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Representation:

Objection to CGB2:
It is not clear whether this policy requires ANY or ALL of the criteria. The word "and" in (d) implies ALL. However there is a risk that this could be misinterpreted to mean ANY, which would be too permissive and in conflict with NPPF.

Full text:

It is not clear whether this policy requires ANY or ALL of the criteria. The word "and" in (d) implies ALL. However there is a risk that this could be misinterpreted to mean ANY, which would be too permissive and in conflict with NPPF.

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 2659

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: St Paul's Walden Parish Council

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation:

Object to CGB2: No exception in NPPF for cross subsidy of private housing

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 5156

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Mr Wilfred Aspinall

Representation:

Support CGB2:
- These should continue but include modern modular house type

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 5209

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Mr and Mrs Ken Ramsey

Number of people: 2

Agent: Moult Walker

Representation:

Support CGB2: Support policy, in particular acknowledgement of market housing cross subsidy

Full text:

See attached

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 5413

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Graveley Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation:

Object to CGB2: Provides opportunity for affordable housing on the edge of villages, contrary to other policy requirements of the plan and NPPF

Full text:

See attachments

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 5936

Received: 24/11/2016

Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)

Representation:

Support CGB2:
- support proposed restraint on inappropriate development in rural areas beyond the Green Belt

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 6112

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation:

Object to CGB2: Unnecessarily duplicates national policy

Full text:

See attached

Object

Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Representation ID: 6146

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation:

Object to CGB2 (and para 6.11) - Lack of definition when site covered or not, interpretation of "adjoining category A village" / "within a category C village" / "beyond built core" / "other relevant study" open to interpretation unless explained in supporting text.
Object to final para in relation to market housing in the Green Belt which is contrary to the NPPF.

Full text:

See attachment

Attachments: