Policy CGB2: Exception sites in rural areas
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 1111
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Phil Beavis
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Objection to CGB2:
It is not clear whether this policy requires ANY or ALL of the criteria. The word "and" in (d) implies ALL. However there is a risk that this could be misinterpreted to mean ANY, which would be too permissive and in conflict with NPPF.
It is not clear whether this policy requires ANY or ALL of the criteria. The word "and" in (d) implies ALL. However there is a risk that this could be misinterpreted to mean ANY, which would be too permissive and in conflict with NPPF.
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 2659
Received: 23/11/2016
Respondent: St Paul's Walden Parish Council
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB2: No exception in NPPF for cross subsidy of private housing
See attachment
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 5156
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Mr Wilfred Aspinall
Support CGB2:
- These should continue but include modern modular house type
See attachment
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 5209
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Mr and Mrs Ken Ramsey
Number of people: 2
Agent: Moult Walker
Support CGB2: Support policy, in particular acknowledgement of market housing cross subsidy
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 5413
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Graveley Parish Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB2: Provides opportunity for affordable housing on the edge of villages, contrary to other policy requirements of the plan and NPPF
See attachments
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 5936
Received: 24/11/2016
Respondent: Hitchin Town Action Group (HTAG)
Support CGB2:
- support proposed restraint on inappropriate development in rural areas beyond the Green Belt
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6112
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB2: Unnecessarily duplicates national policy
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6146
Received: 23/11/2016
Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB2 (and para 6.11) - Lack of definition when site covered or not, interpretation of "adjoining category A village" / "within a category C village" / "beyond built core" / "other relevant study" open to interpretation unless explained in supporting text.
Object to final para in relation to market housing in the Green Belt which is contrary to the NPPF.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6287
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Increment Ltd
Agent: Strutt & Parker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to CGB2: Sites promoted affected by Policy CGB2
See attached