Policy ETC1: Appropriate uses in Employment areas
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 3897
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Letchworth Garden City Heritage Foundation
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
Support the protection of the designated employment areas.
However, object to the restriction for Class B1 uses only for designated locations in Letchworth Garden City, LB1, LB2, LB3 and LB4. Insufficient up to date evidence for this policy in the background papers.
See attached
Support
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 4354
Received: 30/11/2016
Respondent: Kiafield Properties Ltd
Agent: Bidwells
Support ETC1: Allocation of 10.9ha of employment land at Royston
See attached
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 5411
Received: 29/11/2016
Respondent: Graveley Parish Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to ETC1: Employment sites should be reviewed to identify brownfield land for housing, protective approach contrary to national policy
See attachments
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6089
Received: 23/11/2016
Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to ETC1 (and supporting text) - protection of all employment land is not consistent with permitted development rights, source of windfall sites, plan should encourage the use or redevelopment of suitably located employment sites for housing where does not adversely affect current owners and occupiers.
See attachment
Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 6103
Received: 21/11/2016
Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to ETC1: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.
See attached