Policy ETC1: Appropriate uses in Employment areas

Object

Representation ID: 3897

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Letchworth Garden City Heritage Foundation

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Support the protection of the designated employment areas.

However, object to the restriction for Class B1 uses only for designated locations in Letchworth Garden City, LB1, LB2, LB3 and LB4. Insufficient up to date evidence for this policy in the background papers.

Support

Representation ID: 4354

Received: 30/11/2016

Respondent: Kiafield Properties Ltd

Agent: Bidwells

Support ETC1: Allocation of 10.9ha of employment land at Royston

Object

Representation ID: 5411

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Graveley Parish Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to ETC1: Employment sites should be reviewed to identify brownfield land for housing, protective approach contrary to national policy

Object

Representation ID: 6089

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to ETC1 (and supporting text) - protection of all employment land is not consistent with permitted development rights, source of windfall sites, plan should encourage the use or redevelopment of suitably located employment sites for housing where does not adversely affect current owners and occupiers.

Object

Representation ID: 6103

Received: 21/11/2016

Respondent: Rumball Sedgwick

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to ETC1: Contains provisions or seek to introduce controls that are rendered completely otiose by the operation of the GPDO.