Object
Proposed Main Modifications
Representation ID: 6924
Received: 28/02/2019
Respondent: Baldock, Bygrave and Clothall Planning Group
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
[Please also refer to our representations on MM207 and MM208, which relate to the same issue]
We object to these modifications for the following reasons:
The proposed amendment to the text fails to provide adequate guidance on the appropriate extent of development in this part of Baldock. It refers to bunding which does not appear to exist in the location suggested, and it does not provide clarity about the outer limits of proposed development.
[Please also refer to our representations on MM207 and MM208, which relate to the same issue]
We object to these modifications for the following reasons:
The proposed amendment to the text fails to provide adequate guidance on the appropriate extent of development in this part of Baldock. It refers to bunding which does not appear to exist in the location suggested, and it does not provide clarity about the outer limits of proposed development.