Object

Representation ID: 6079

Received: 23/11/2016

Respondent: CPRE Hertfordshire

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to part (a) and (b) - not justified by sound evidence, not justified that luton need should be met in the district, no exception circumstances, criticisms in relation to para 4.53, not NPPF compliant - meet objectively assessed need "unless policies in the NPPF say that development should be restricted. more detailed and sophisticated analysis needed - no justification or explanation for "acute" need.
part (c) - see para 4.60 comments flawed interpretation of NPPF, only redrawing permanent GB boundaries in exceptional circumstances.

part d and para 4.95? - only 20% on PDL, greater capacity from previously developed land, reduce the need for housing development in the GReen Belt and contribute to meeting a lower and more sustainable housing target.

part eii and para 4.104-4.105 - removal of land w of Stevenage for development after 2026 is unsound because it is unjustified and inconsistent with national policy, No exceptional circumstances demonstrated,