Object
Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft
Representation ID: 5880
Received: 28/11/2016
Respondent: Save Rural Baldock Group
Number of people: 3
Legally compliant? No
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Objection in relation to Baldock (Sustainability Appraisal):
SP3, BA10, SP5:cannot be justified as being the most appropriate strategy, when considered against the reasonable alternatives
BA1 and SP4:Sustainability appraisal notes (table 9) creates a high probability of adverse impacts on landscape and townscape character. The Landscape sensitivity Study (July 2013) identifies BA1 to have moderate to high landscape sensitivity.Cannot be justified as most appropriate strategy,given impact on town character and inability to solve integration issues.
-plan not justified as most appropriate strategy against reasonable alternatives.West of Stevenage should be reconsidered-delivery
D4:plan cannot be justified as most appropriate strategy, against the reasonable alternatives (Priory Fields)
-not consistent with national policy-air quality limits (NPPF paragraph 124)
See attachment