Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document

Object

Representation ID: 8438

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bellcross Homes and Gallagher Developments Ltd

Agent: Rapleys LLP

1.5.4 - SPD should not be considered for adoption ahead of the ELP. Substantial delay should be clarified. SPD should confirm a case by case basis is adopted to the applicability of the current SPD and any HCC documents as and when they are adopted.

1.9.2 - S106 is not a contractual agreement between the applicants and third parites. No statutory basis for third parties, such as the NHS, to be signatories to a S106 agreement. Suggests deletion

1.11.2 - Re-wording suggested to 'The strategic sites will need to address any specific contribution requirements set out in their individual policies, other relevant policies in the plan, and in this document.

Object

Representation ID: 8471

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bellcross Homes and Gallagher Developments Ltd

Agent: Rapleys LLP

2.1.3 - will registered providers be able to provide a meaningful view a this stage?

2.1.4 - In the absence of a fixed scheme, it will not be possible to provide a meaningful viability appraisal.

2.2.5 - Would lead to significant legal and consultant costs ahead of planning committee. Flexibility should be applied in he second sentence of the paragraph.

2.8.1 - Needs to be subject to trigger wording - Commute sums will be indexed linked from exchange to either the payment due date, or if later, when the sum is paid.

Object

Representation ID: 8472

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bellcross Homes and Gallagher Developments Ltd

Agent: Rapleys LLP

4.2.3 - 'Any Highway measures sought will be require for mitigation purposes and be subject to meeting the 3 statutory tests set out in the CIL regs and policy tests in the NPPF'.

4.2.6 - Add 'where the statutory tests under CIL reg 122 are met, ... improvements to cycle and pedestrian routes, ... and public transport ... securing ... /secure ... of the Travel Plan for a maximum period of three years following first occupation'.

Object

Representation ID: 8473

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bellcross Homes and Gallagher Developments Ltd

Agent: Rapleys LLP

5.3.4 - Further principles to be added. Restrictions to prevent purchasers selling plots on for a profit. If insufficient interest, plots should return to developer. Flexibility to be applied to detailed permissions to allow bespoke designs. Flexibility in allowing all self build plots to be made available by 50% completion on-site. Protect developers against partially built self-build.

Object

Representation ID: 8475

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bellcross Homes and Gallagher Developments Ltd

Agent: Rapleys LLP

7.4 - The Council should set the requirement to meet CIL regs and evidence the tests are met for health contributions to be provided by ENHCCG.

7.2.2- suggested amendment - the provision and/or contributions towards the serviced land may also be required, to be determined on a case by case basis.

7.4.1 - What is 'largest development sites'?

7.4.3 - justification fails CIL reg tests.

Object

Representation ID: 8476

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bellcross Homes and Gallagher Developments Ltd

Agent: Rapleys LLP

8.4.23 - 'For larger or strategic sites, the ten-year timeframe will also apply', provides certainty by deleting may be extended.