Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document

Object

Representation ID: 8433

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands

Agent: White Peak Planning

1.9.2 - Third party signatories for contributions in excess of £150,000 will cause delays to permissions. Suggests deletion of paragraph.

1.11 - Add subject to Reg 122(2) of CIL regs to guide and moderate requests for contributions. Remove final paragraph as not specific enough to add value.

Object

Representation ID: 8463

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands

Agent: White Peak Planning

2.2.5 - Delays in S106 from third party signatories.

2.1.2 - Resolve typographical errors and clarify. Remove 'or any other form of development for which an obligation may be expected on a fair reading of this guidance' as it is not specific enough.

2.1.3 - Add 'These discussions will be co-ordinated by the NHDC pre-application case officer' for clarity and consistency.

2.2.2 - Insert 'NHDC' before 'case officer'. Bullet point 3 is a partial replication of bullet point 2, avoid replication by inserting 'applications are dealt with in a fair, balanced and consistent way having regard to all relevant policy requirements'.

Object

Representation ID: 8464

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands

Agent: White Peak Planning

3.3 - Provide criteria for schemes required to contribute towards public realm enhancements.

Object

Representation ID: 8465

Received: 25/03/2020

Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands

Agent: White Peak Planning

8.4 - Table to be amended to show the units of measurement and annotate or remove the footnote.