MM041 - Page 50 Paragraph 4.101
Object
Proposed Main Modifications
Representation ID: 6816
Received: 16/01/2019
Respondent: Ms Mel Cherry
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
See full text
I am concerned that Letchworth town planning is of historical significance - it was not intended to grow any bigger. The areas being made available for new build are not helpful for traffic flow to and from the town. If necessary more brown sites should be used.
I am furious every time I pass the top of Avenue One which is being redeveloped for a hotel, shop and Macdonalds. It would have been perfect for many new houses.
When I approached a councillor with regard to the Avenue One site I was told it was owned privately. What happened to Compulsory Purchase Orders.
When Welwyn GC was planned Odsey, at Ashwell station, was also considered as a good site for a new town. Why not meet government requirement for new houses in North Herts by building there? Yes, I know some of it is in Cambridgeshire but we are allowing Luton to extend into Herts I believe.
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
Representation ID: 7832
Received: 11/04/2019
Respondent: Graveley Parish Council
See attached
See Attached
Support
Proposed Main Modifications
Representation ID: 7993
Received: 11/04/2019
Respondent: Southern and Regional Developments Ltd
Agent: Claremont Planning Consultancy
See attached.
See Attached
Comment
Proposed Main Modifications
Representation ID: 8263
Received: 11/04/2019
Respondent: Mrs Cheryl Peers
See attached
See attached
Object
Proposed Main Modifications
Representation ID: 8330
Received: 11/04/2019
Respondent: Save The Worlds First Garden City
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Yes
See attached
See Attached