Object

Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document

Representation ID: 8448

Received: 24/03/2020

Respondent: New Road (Ashbrook) Ltd

Agent: Miss Charlotte Bailey

Representation Summary:

2.1.2 - LPA should provide figures for draft HoT in pre-app, not developers. The Council should not expect developer to fund every aspect of the Council's operation.

2.1.3 - The Council cannot require pre-application consultation with other parties, in some cases, there is no mechanism to do so.

2.1.4 - Financial viability is not a land use issue.

2.2.3 - Contradicts 2.1.3. District is co-ordinating, should discourage pre-app with other authorities to establish obligations.

2.2.5 - Requirements are likely to prove impractical and will lead to LPA failing to meet its performance targets.

2.3.5 - Question whether viability data should be public.

2.5.4 - On prioritising affordable housing provision, contributions sought by HCC represent priority matters to make development acceptable.