3. Economy and Town Centres
Object
Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 8439
Received: 24/03/2020
Respondent: Barkway Parish Council
3.2.1 - A commitment to deliver social value through the planning system is set out in the section on the economic development of town centres. The document should also recognise that economic appraisal is required where development will harm the local economy as with the implications of businesses that would be damaged by BK3.
Object
Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 8445
Received: 17/03/2020
Respondent: Hertfordshire Constabulary - Architectural Liaison
3.3.6 …. The Council may seek contributions towards the ongoing maintenance of any public realm improvements to be provided, and where assessed, additional policing to ensure the security of the public realm.
The work of regeneration is wholly supported by the PCC as part of the process of helping communities to become sustainable and safe places for all. The creation of a safe public realm does, however, create the need for adequate additional policing. Because of the need to build these costs into any viability appraisal it is considered that specific reference should be made to the need for developer contribution to cover these costs.
Object
Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 8451
Received: 24/03/2020
Respondent: Letchworth Garden City Heritage Foundation
Agent: Planning Matters
3.3.1 - the Section 106 requirements associated with town centre development should be lesser than those in out of town locations, in order to support town centres.
3.3.3 - Any contributions should directly, fairly and reasonably relate to the scale of the development proposed.
3.3.4 - The completion of works on land outside the applicant’s control may not be feasible. Therefore, unless an agreement is in place with the relevant third party, such a requirement would be unreasonable.
3.3.5 - The text should refer to Paragraphs 1.3.2 and 1.3.3 for clarity.
3.3.6 - Where such contributions are required these should be applied in a transparent and consistent manner, ideally based on reporting of previous contributions.
Object
Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 8458
Received: 23/03/2020
Respondent: Osprey Homes Ltd
Agent: JB Planning Associates
3.2 - Clarity should be provided in relation to the definition of 'larger sites'. Suggestion of 500+.
Object
Developer Contributions Supplementary Planning Document
Representation ID: 8464
Received: 25/03/2020
Respondent: Bloor Homes South Midlands
Agent: White Peak Planning
3.3 - Provide criteria for schemes required to contribute towards public realm enhancements.