Local Plan 2011-2031 Proposed Submission Draft

Object

Representation ID: 3833

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to SP2: Broadly support allocation as landowner / promoter, minor modifications sought to site specific criteria

Object

Representation ID: 3834

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to SP5: Unclear that new Green Belt has been considered in light of levels of housing growth required, unclear why Rural Area policy is so restrictive

Object

Representation ID: 3835

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to SP7: Clarity required over CIL and s106 routes, infrastructure will not always meet statutory tests or be responsibility of developer, "stringent" not explained

Object

Representation ID: 3836

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to SP8: Treatment of migration and market signals in establishing housing requirements, unclear how PDL target will be met, unclear how new settlement work will be carried forward, criterion (f) and (g) too prescriptive, 20% buffer required

Object

Representation ID: 3838

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to SP9: Justification for technical standards (criterion d) unclear

Object

Representation ID: 3840

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to SP11: Policy needs to acknowledge development can effect betterment in regard to flood risk

Object

Representation ID: 3841

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to HS2: Council needs to specify tenure mix precisely, seeks justification of affordability, cannot require retention in perpetuity, requirement to consider other surveys does not provide clear policy

Object

Representation ID: 3842

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to HS3(a): Too prescriptive and doesn't recognise design-led solutions

Object

Representation ID: 3843

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to HS5: assessment of viability contrary to national policy, too prescriptive, cumulative impacts of policies need to be considered

Object

Representation ID: 3844

Received: 29/11/2016

Respondent: Pigeon Land Ltd

Agent: Keymer Cavendish Limited

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Object to D1: Too prescriptive, unclear how standards have been arrived at, no consideration of cumulative impacts